NAV: AutoBeta Home > AutoBeta Popular content >

original judgment Learn more about original judgment

AutoBeta has retrieved the following content about original judgment for you across the entire web.

• 

  The second trial upheld the original verdict! Tesla wins the lawsuit against "5 million fans of Douyin".

  The result of the judgment of the second instance was announced, and the result of the judgment was upheld, and the judgment was final. In other words, this case ended in Tesla's victory. In June 2022, Tesla sued "Boss Cai" for infringement of reputation. On October 31 of the same year, the result of the first instance of the case was announced, and the judgment showed that the court recognized

  Boss Tess Tesla video judgment platform company content friend case court result infringement second instance event 2023-03-14
• 

  Buy Shijie equipped with "shanzhai" stereo, the second trial upheld the original verdict: refund one indemnity three indemnity 1.859 million

  The country's first audio fraud constitutes a second-instance judgment in a vehicle fraud case, and the court upheld the original verdict: the company returned 619800 yuan to Chen Bo for car purchase and paid 1.8594 million yuan in compensation. In March 2015, Mr. Chen of Chongqing spent 619800 yuan on a Porsche Macan from Chongqing Haoda Automobile sales Co., Ltd. in June 2017, the owner of the car, Mr. Chen, was ready to sell the car and drive to the used car market for inspection. When he found that the vehicle's "BOSE original stereo" label automatically fell off, after professional appraisal, Mr. Chen learned that the so-called BOSE stereo was a fake. It.

  Porsche 2019-04-25
• 

  Lost! Court final judgment: Tesla sales fraud "return one for one compensation"

  Tesla was sued by the car owner for "suspected sales fraud". The court finally ruled that Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd. lost the case and needed to return the car at the original price and compensate the owner for the purchase of 778200 yuan. According to the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability dispute of Li Zhilong and Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Wenzhou) Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, the party Li Zhilong (hereinafter referred to as "Mr. Li") spent 778200 yuan to buy Tesla Model X, and later found that the car had inconsistent model certificates of drive motors, so Mr. Li sold Tesla cars (Wenzhou).

  Tesla 2021-06-22
• 

  BMW caught fire while driving, and the owner sued for 190000 yuan.

  Recently, the Civil judgment of second instance on Product liability disputes of Guangzhou Baoyue Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., BMW (China) Automobile Trading Co., Ltd., issued by the Intermediate people's Court of Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, rejected the above and upheld the original verdict. this judgment is final. The course of the case: in March 2011, Xiao bought a BMW off-road vehicle in Guangzhou Baoyue for 709000 yuan. in the subsequent use process, the plaintiff used the vehicle according to the vehicle manual and maintained it regularly. In September 2018, the car suddenly smoked and caught fire while driving on the road, and was finally burned into an empty shell. In October 2018,.

  BMW 2021-08-22
• 

  7500 yuan for 200000 Mercedes-Benz sellers do not deliver goods! Final judgment: compensation of 196000 yuan

  Some time ago, a shopping dispute over a used car auction triggered a heated discussion among netizens. A user reported that he killed a second-hand Mercedes-Benz car with the original price of 204000 yuan at a price of 7500 yuan on Taobao auction. However, the seller then contacted him and said that the price was mismarked and hoped that he could get a refund. The user refused a refund and urged delivery several times. Subsequently, the two sides went to court on the matter. Recently, the incident has finally come to an end. According to the court documents, the Chengdu Intermediate people's Court of Sichuan Province issued a final judgment on the case, and the company was awarded 196500 yuan in compensation to Mr. Liu. Related matters.

  Mercedes Benz 2021-11-16
• 

  New development of Hangzhou Mercedes-Benz 4S store refund one-for-three incident: car owners get 2.7 million yuan

  When the imported Mercedes-Benz CLS bought in 700000 was licensed, it was found that the tires and wheels were privately replaced by the 4S store into a smaller size. The car owner sued the 4S store after negotiation with the 4S store, demanding a return of one for three. The court ruled that the Mercedes-Benz 4S store constituted a sales fraud and refunded one to three by the car price, with a cumulative sum of nearly 2.7 million yuan. 4S shop refused to appeal, and the court of second instance decided to support the refund of one for three treatment, rejected the appeal and upheld the original verdict. Recently, Zhejiang online reporter contacted the owner of the case to represent the lawyer that at present the Mercedes-Benz 4S store has fulfilled its judgment obligations and 2.7 million yuan has been settled. Another successful case of refund and compensation for three-dimensional rights.

  Mercedes-Benz ten thousand yuan 2019-04-19
• 

  The mileage of buying a second-hand BMW was changed and the court decided that the car company did not constitute fraud.

  At the end of 2018, Mr. Li, who lives in Changsha, Hunan Province, bought a used BMW from a second-hand dealer in Xianglong Chesheng, Changsha County. Soon after, Mr. Li found that the mileage of the car had been adjusted by nearly 10,000 kilometers. Mr. Li sued the used car dealer to the local court, which finally ruled that the car dealer did not constitute fraud. Mr. Li felt very confused. Let's take a look at what happened: on November 26, 2018, Mr. Li spent 180000 yuan on a BMW X5 used car shipped in 2008 at the Xianglong Cesheng used car dealer in Changsha County, Hunan Province.

  BMW car dealership court 2019-05-17
• 

  Trademark infringement! Tesla sued a company for a compensation of 5 million yuan

  Recently, the verdict of Tesla v. "Tesla Beer" trademark infringement was announced, and the verdict was "reject the appeal and uphold the original verdict". In other words, Tesla won this case. According to reports, the court determined that the Tesla series of trademarks were well-known trademarks and sentenced the defendant Zhongyin Food Co., Ltd. ("Tesla Beer").

  Tex Tesla trademark beer judgment company court appeal infringement miscarriage original judgment brand limited limited consumer 2023-08-10
• 

  The latest result of the one-for-three refund case: Tesla's application for retrial was rejected

  Today, Mr. Han, a party to Tesla's "withdrawal of one indemnity for three" case, said in a personal Weibo post: the Beijing Municipal higher people's Court has ruled in accordance with the law to reject Tesla's application for retrial, and the case has been finally concluded for more than three years. Reviewing the related events, the car owner, Mr. Han, spent 379700 yuan on Tesla Guan.com in 2019.

  Tex Tesla vehicle company Hanxian car owner first instance accident court judgment reputation right of reputation case Beijing structure 2023-03-28
• 

  Tesla was ordered to pay 100000 yuan in compensation for selling the accident car.

  Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. was awarded 100000 yuan in compensation, according to the Beijing Court trial Information Network today. According to the verdict, the case is a dispute over a sale contract. The defendant is Tesla Automobile sales and Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd., and the plaintiffs are Luo Xianghao and Zhou Yan. The specific events are

  Tex Tesla vehicle company accident sales maintenance car owner Zhou Yan major case structure judgment used car court 2022-06-21
• 

  Progress: Mercedes-Benz 4S store was sentenced to "return one to three" for replacing three no-middle cylinders. The owner: if the loss is too great, he will appeal again.

  The failure of the Mercedes-Benz car was repaired at the 4S store, but the 4S store bought the "three nots" engine cylinder from the auto parts city for replacement, which eventually led to the engine cylinder bursting. The car owner took the 4S store to court and complained to Zhengzhou Market Supervision and Management Bureau. At present, new progress has been made in the case. According to the judgment of Zhengzhou Erqi District people's Court, the defendant Zhengzhou Huisheng Mercedes-Benz sales and Service Co., Ltd. refunded 43650.01 yuan to the plaintiff Mr. Cai for the maintenance of the middle tank within 10 days from the effective date of the judgment, and compensated Mr. Cai for the maintenance loss of 130950.03 yuan. The court held that the insurance company signed insurance with Huisheng Mercedes-Benz.

  Mercedes-Benz E200L 2019-11-03
• 

  Tesla sued goods to play the final victory! Product play: will be submitted for retrial

  On June 13th, Pinplay issued a statement on its official Weibo on the verdict of the second instance in Tesla's case. The Shanghai No. 1 Intermediate people's Court has made a final judgment on the infringement of reputation by Beijing Pinci Interactive Technology Co., Ltd., the operator of Tesla (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., the statement said.

  Tesi Tesla judgment company court article limited limited Shanghai reputation official platform people's court people reputation right 2023-06-13
• 

  Heavy! Jiangling refused to accept the judgment and appealed to the court, refusing to admit that Lu Feng X7 copied Land Rover.

  In March this year, Jaguar Land Rover eagerly announced a major news that the infringement case of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Jiangling Company) was sued by the Chaoyang District people's Court in Beijing, China, and finally won after three years of litigation. The court ordered Jiangling to immediately stop the "unfair competition behavior" involved in the case, immediately stop production and sale of two specific Land Wind X7 models, issued a statement on the official website and media, and paid 1.5 million yuan in compensation to Jaguar Land Rover. We looked through the official website of Jiangling Company and Lufeng Motor and found no relevant statement about the lawsuit. On the contrary, Jiangling Motor Co., Ltd.

  2019-04-23
• 

  Tesla won the final case of "chip reduction", and the car owner's request for "core change" was rejected.

  On March 2, 2020, a car owner Tesla posted on Weibo that the configuration of the upgraded after-drive version of the domestic standard Model 3 had been downgraded and that the car was equipped with a vehicle controller code-named 1462554 (FSD chip HW3.0), but when the owner removed the vehicle controller, he found it was code-named 1465773 (FSD chip HW2.5). Compared with the HW2.5 chip, the computing power of the HW3.0 chip is 21 times higher than that of the HW2.5 chip.

  Tesla 2021-08-06
• 

  Verdict! Tesla returns one to three!

  The owner, Mr. Han, reflected in Tesla's online purchase of a Tesla officially certified second-hand car, Model S P85, and was told by the sales before purchase that there were no major accidents, blisters, fires and structural damage in the Tesla certified car, but Mr. Han always found some minor problems in the car and needed to frequently go to the Tesla service center for repair. after passing the third-party inspection, the vehicle C-pillar and rear wing were cut and welded. Tesla was sued in anger. Since the protection of his rights in August 19, Mr. Han has waited for the court's ruling: return one to three. Today, Han, the owner of Tesla, said in a post, "I won the case, Beijing No.2 Middle Court Wei."

  Tesla 2021-09-17
• 

  Compensation of 300000 yuan! Weilai succeeds in suing Douyin Big V

  On Nov. 14, the legal Department of Weilai said in a post on its official Weibo that the final verdict of the case of "vehicle discipline" infringing on the reputation right of Weilai came out and the case was won. Officials said: upon receipt of the court's final judgment, the court found that the video content involved in the infringer's Shanghai ladder case was untrue, misleading people who were not clear about the price information of electric vehicles.

  Video account judgment Price Justice Ministry of Justice misleading Price content aspect Court Battery Norway Public official 2023-11-15
• 

  A public apology and a compensation of 5 million! Dongfeng Co., Ltd. won the lawsuit against Beijing car thousands of miles away.

  On August 25, the official account "NI+ Planet" on Dongfeng Nissan announced that Dongfeng Motor Co., Ltd. won over Beijing Auto Qianli Interactive Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "che Qianli"). Dongfeng Nissan in "Justice will not be absent!" Dongfeng Co., Ltd. v. Beijing che Qianli Internet infringement case won the second instance, "the article said:"

  Dongfeng Company Limited Qianli Co. Ltd. Automobile Dongfeng Automobile judgment Video Qijun second instance Laboratory Bull cart account experiment 2023-08-25
• 

  Land Rover accuses Jiangling of turning defeat into victory! Lu Feng X7 plagiarized range Rover Aurora Patent was ruled invalid

  On December 16, 2019, the Supreme people's Court of the people's Republic of China rejected the second-instance retrial application of Jiangling Holdings Co., Ltd., upholding the second-instance judgment of the Beijing Supreme people's Court, according to the China referee Writing website. Lu Feng X7 was found to have copied the aurora design of Land Rover. Range Rover Aurora made its debut at the 2010 Guangzhou Motor Show, while Jiangling Holdings' Lufeng X7 made its debut at the 2014 Guangzhou Motor Show. The biggest highlight of the Land Wind X7 is its appearance, because the Land Wind X7 is highly similar to the Land Rover Aurora, and the price is much cheaper than the Land Rover Aurora.

  Land wind X7 2020-01-09
• 

  Millions of Land Rover fell to its nest many times in two years, and the court ordered the sales company to return the car with an indemnity of 4 million.

  Mr. Yu from Wuhan bought a 16 range Rover 3.0TV6 diesel version for 1.21 million in 2016. The car cracked on four wheels during the two-month warranty of the new car and stalled at high speed a year later. At the beginning of 2016, Mr. Yu browsed to a parallel imported car sales company in Wuhan, and Mr. Yu took the initiative to leave contact information, and soon the staff of the other side contacted Mr. Yu to see the car in the company. On January 23, 2016, Mr. Yu took a fancy to the 2016 range Rover diesel models at the company, and then the two sides signed a "passenger car sales."

  Land Rover sales court 2019-06-03
• 

  The youth car is suspected of withdrawing funds, and the 26.7 billion project is enforced.

  On August 5, according to the enforcement ruling issued by the Supreme people's Court of Ningxia Hui Autonomous region, a project with a planned investment of 26.709 billion yuan in Shizuishan, Ningxia, officially entered the stage of compulsory implementation. The case, which has dragged on for many years, is finally coming to an end. The youth car project began in 2010, when the youth car signed an "investment contract" with the Shizuishan people's government under the guise of building a car, saying that it would invest 26.709 billion yuan in Shizuishan. Used for the construction of 210000 heavy trucks, 100000 Lotus cars, 510000 large engines project; and as a youth.

  Car executive 2019-08-06